The Gospel reading for this week has a parable and its interpretation once again – just like last week. And once again, the reading skips over part of the narrative that St. Matthew is constructing. Given that it can seem like parables are just a funny sort of rhetorical device that rabbis used in Jesus’ day to teach their disciples, whereas in truth, the hard work of trying to unpack the meaning or meanings of a parable is how the path of wisdom was shown to the hearers.
We do ourselves a disservice when we skip from teaching to interpretation in the lectionary. When that happens it seems like we’re demonstrating that faith is easy, just know the answers to the questions and good things will come to you. (And that’s certainly been a message I’ve heard from preachers over the years.) But that’s not at all how this works, and I don’t think it was what Jesus was saying in this passage or in any of the others where we hear his teachings to his disciples.
Spiritual growth requires friction. It requires us to live into confusion and discomfort and a kind of lack of clarity as we struggle to make sense of who God is and what God expects of us. Honestly, most learning, real internalized learning, requires enough friction that we can internalize what we have grasped. Superficial, easy answers give way to simple learning that is quickly forgotten. It’s one of the many concerns I and others have about using Artificial Intelligence in unwise ways.
You can watch the full sermon directly at this link.
This week’s Gospel reading skips over the, to my mind, most interesting part of the reading. In between the parable of the sower and its explanation is a vignette where the disciples take Jesus aside apart from the crowd and push to know why it is that he teaches in parables rather than speaking the truth plainly.
This Sunday’s Gospel (Matthew 10:40–42) is only three verses long, but it quietly rearranges the way most of us keep score. We’re trained to read résumés: titles, degrees, the things a person earns and accumulates over a lifetime. And we tend to assume God reads us the same way, tallying up what we’ve managed to make of ourselves.
We read the Bible as though we are always meant to be focused on Isaac, the chosen one, the child of the promise, the one the story is about, the one who is the ancestor of Israel. But this story is also, quietly, about the one who gets sent away, the one who exits the story at this point in Moses’ account of his people. God says something remarkable to Abraham: do not be distressed about the boy. As for the son of the slave woman, I will make a nation of him also, because he is your offspring.
This Gospel, The Gospel, is not about the people whom God will accept, who God wants to accept, who are outside the walls right now, waiting to hear the Good News. It’s as much about us, the good people who have come to worship God. We are the descendants of Gentiles, we are not the Children of Abraham, but because of God’s love and compassion, and in spite of everything that we have done, we are now adopted into the family of the insider, we are the Daughter, the child of God.
The encyclical released this week is being characterized primarily as a Critique of AI. But to be frank it’s not so much of AI as of the economics, and particularly the disparity between wealth and poverty that is behind AI’s rise. And also of the exploitation of people, the environment and the spiritual realm that seems to be happening too.
Most of us carry, somewhere beneath the surface, an image of how we think we ought to appear before God. It is usually the image of our best self — and more often than not, it is also our younger self. Strong, unbroken, theologically coherent, morally uncomplicated, capable of the kind of sustained prayer and clarity that we may have managed on some good days decades ago and cannot quite manage now. We imagine that to stand before God we must first somehow get back to that self. We have the instinct of the Capitol fresco of George Washington being made a God: the ascension will complete us by removing what time and failure and grief and illness have done to us.
In this week’s reading, which follows directly after last week’s Gospel, Jesus reassures the disciples that, even though he is leaving them, his teaching and his Spirit will remain with them. That Spirit — working in them — will fulfill what they lack. The Advocate, the one who will speak on their behalf in moments of judgment and inspire their speech in times of testing, will lead them more deeply into the truth of God’s love and God’s will for the world.